老娘碎碎念｜Oh...Mr. Dolce and Mr Gabbana

請細心欣賞/觀賞/留意/細看以下的fashion items。

先撇除一切政治原因，what the fuck are these?

肉酸並不是罪（正如fashion界有太多概念我是too incapable to comprehend），if it wasn't Dolce & Gabbana。

不久之前，兩位曾公開表示反對同性領養以及IVF（體外人工受精），並表示：
❛ We oppose gay adoptions. The only family is the traditional one. No chemical offsprings and rented uterus: life has a natural flow, there are things that should not be changed. I call children of chemistry, synthetic children. Uteri [for] rent, semen chosen from a catalog.❜

好，唔緊要，反正歉已道，舊帳先別理。

衝口而出一堆荒謬的言論，相隔沒多久卻make money at the expenses of gay families。Gabbana先生解釋：❛People change and change their ideas.❜

Oh well，好似荒謬得理幾合理。不過咁，如果特首先生聽日突然開記者會話：「其實高鐵實在太超支，經商議後決定停止撥款，我改變主意喇」，俾著我都會打冷震兼開始思考到底有咩世紀大陰謀。

又的確，就係咁岩得咁橋，義大利人開始爭取同性同未婚異性伴侶權益。結果呢，食住個勢加多把口。唔準諗即刻答，真情定假意，gimmick定supportive，大家心中有數。順帶一提，'I asked about adoption in Italy. It's very hard for straight couples - imagine you're gay!'，完美拋返個波俾義大利。

先唔好理梵蒂岡乜乜乜天主教乜乜乜。當無人出聲嗰陣就笠水，不，even worse，多踩兩腳；到有人開始平反，又就返埋嚟湊熱鬧，擺埋人地上runway，再要加幾個心心emoji。究竟係一種mocking定宣傳，或者根本兩者同步進行，I have no damn comment。By the way，個歉唔係要為自己言論而道，係要為俾你地話不自然的人工孩子們('synthetic children')道。'Don't mean to offend anyone', i.e. Offended and thanks.

反智程度同建制派有得揮：兩邊得罪，吃力不討好。

＿你，明光社嚟嘅喂。

Bryan Boy表示，欣賞兩位公開轉軚。係真心的話當然好，純粹擺人上檯（I mean條橋），就免了。